HIDDEN CAM SHOWS ANTI-GUN CONGRESSMAN AND STAFFERS REFUSING TO PROMOTE HOMES AS “GUN FREE ZONES”

TRUE LIBERTY

TRUE LIBERTY

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2016
Messages
6,198
Location
Florida
HYPOCRITES! And there name is liberal.
Dirtbag politician Charlie Rangel explained last month that regular people simply don’t need firearms for self defense, but that politicians like himself should most certainly be allowed to carry protection because they “deserve” it.

But Rangel isn’t alone in his hypocrisy. As you’ll see in the latest hidden camera video from WATCH: Hidden Cam Shows Anti-Gun Congressman and Staffers Refusing To Promote Homes As “Gun Free Zones” - Freedom Outpost
Click to expand...
 
Bluezone777

Bluezone777

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2016
Messages
1,370
Location
Florida
As long as there are criminals who believe they need guns to commit crime then there will be people who believe they need guns to defend themselves.

I think we would all be better served if we focused on getting guns out of the hands of criminals and the uneducated law abiding citizen as those two groups are what makes guns dangerous. You do this by putting the criminal when caught into a jail cell and by demanding that the uneducated citizen be taught how to properly handle and use the firearm he or she owns before they can have the right to use it so they can stop being an uneducated law abiding citizen and start being an educated law abiding citizen. A citizen who is certified as having been trained to use the gun they own and then proceeds to use it in a way that is contrary to their training then they should be punished by the law for it.
 
Webster

Webster

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2016
Messages
14,088
Location
North Carolina
Webster said:
When your side gives up guns, Liberty, our side will go with gun-free zones there.
Click to expand...
*continues previous thought* Besides, @TRUE LIBERTY , its' a sleazy-as-hell BS argument Freedom Outpost is making above; by virtue of their position as Members of Congress, they're just as entitled to protection if needed as anyone else...and given the charged environment we currently find ourselves in, to even suggest that they should give up said protection is frankly pathetic on your side's part.
 
TRUE LIBERTY

TRUE LIBERTY

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2016
Messages
6,198
Location
Florida
Webster said:
*continues previous thought* Besides, @TRUE LIBERTY , its' a sleazy-as-hell BS argument Freedom Outpost is making above; by virtue of their position as Members of Congress, they're just as entitled to protection if needed as anyone else...and given the charged environment we currently find ourselves in, to even suggest that they should give up said protection is frankly pathetic on your side's part.
Click to expand...

NOPE! It just shows they are cowards and do not believe in what they stand for. Take that liberal stance somewhere else.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom