• If your user name appeared to be a real first and last name (fictitious or not), your user name has been changed to just your first name. As of May 1, 2018 no full real names are allowed as user names.

HIDDEN CAM SHOWS ANTI-GUN CONGRESSMAN AND STAFFERS REFUSING TO PROMOTE HOMES AS “GUN FREE ZONES”

TRUE LIBERTY

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2016
Messages
3,956
Location
Central Florida
HYPOCRITES! And there name is liberal.
Dirtbag politician Charlie Rangel explained last month that regular people simply don’t need firearms for self defense, but that politicians like himself should most certainly be allowed to carry protection because they “deserve” it.

But Rangel isn’t alone in his hypocrisy. As you’ll see in the latest hidden camera video from WATCH: Hidden Cam Shows Anti-Gun Congressman and Staffers Refusing To Promote Homes As “Gun Free Zones” - Freedom Outpost
 

Bluezone777

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2016
Messages
1,155
Location
SW Florida
As long as there are criminals who believe they need guns to commit crime then there will be people who believe they need guns to defend themselves.

I think we would all be better served if we focused on getting guns out of the hands of criminals and the uneducated law abiding citizen as those two groups are what makes guns dangerous. You do this by putting the criminal when caught into a jail cell and by demanding that the uneducated citizen be taught how to properly handle and use the firearm he or she owns before they can have the right to use it so they can stop being an uneducated law abiding citizen and start being an educated law abiding citizen. A citizen who is certified as having been trained to use the gun they own and then proceeds to use it in a way that is contrary to their training then they should be punished by the law for it.
 

Webster

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2016
Messages
13,541
Location
North Carolina
When your side gives up guns, Liberty, our side will go with gun-free zones there.
*continues previous thought* Besides, @TRUE LIBERTY , its' a sleazy-as-hell BS argument Freedom Outpost is making above; by virtue of their position as Members of Congress, they're just as entitled to protection if needed as anyone else...and given the charged environment we currently find ourselves in, to even suggest that they should give up said protection is frankly pathetic on your side's part.
 

TRUE LIBERTY

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2016
Messages
3,956
Location
Central Florida
*continues previous thought* Besides, @TRUE LIBERTY , its' a sleazy-as-hell BS argument Freedom Outpost is making above; by virtue of their position as Members of Congress, they're just as entitled to protection if needed as anyone else...and given the charged environment we currently find ourselves in, to even suggest that they should give up said protection is frankly pathetic on your side's part.
NOPE! It just shows they are cowards and do not believe in what they stand for. Take that liberal stance somewhere else.
 
Top Bottom